If we have worked, should we not be entitled to eat and drink? Surely. As every other human being, these basic needs need to be maintained. Yet, the Apostle Paul did not insist his basic right to food and drink to maintain human life. He did not insist even on his right. He explained in Romans 14:21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.

The Apostle Paul was criticized and questioned for living a sacrificial life. He did not marry although he has every right to do so. He wanted to wholeheartedly serve the Lord. And he also did not receive support from the Corinthian Church although he founded the church in Corinth and the Corinthian Christians were his “work in the Lord.”

The Apostle Paul reasoned with the church in Corinth that he was sent by Jesus Christ to preach the gospel to them. The fact that they are in the Lord attest his apostleship. God’s grace came upon them to open their hearts and to save them. Why did he have to speak thus? Because the believers in Corinth were resisting to amend their ways according to the counsel that the Apostle Paul was giving to them. Instead, they have chosen to undermine his authority by raising in question his God-given mandate, for their spiritual welfare.

The Apostle Paul seeks to defend his apostleship. He is divinely called by his Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus.

Luke recorded his salvation and all to the ministry:

Acts 9:1-18 And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest, And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem. And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink. And there was a certain disciple at Damascus, named Ananias; and to him said the Lord in a vision, Ananias. And he said, Behold, I am here, Lord. And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and inquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth, And hath seen in a vision a man named Ananias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his sight. Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name’s sake. And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost. And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized.

Did not the Corinthian Christians see the power of God in the Apostle Paul’s ministry.? Why did they question his authority?

The Apostle Paul was willing to set the example by his abstinence from meat offered to idols. He willingly gives up his right to ensure that he will not stumble the weaker brother in Christ. A commendable spirit that he seeks to inculcate in the hearts of the believers at Corinth so that the brethren look out to strengthen and build up the faith of one another. A noteworthy lesson for the believers.

Jesus said that you do good to the least of your brethren, you are doing it unto Me (Matthew 25:40). Here, in our text, the believer may be going about his own life and may be oblivious that his words and actions can weaken the faith of a fellow believer. And the offence against such a one is as you have sinned against Christ. Christ will not be pleased when we so sin against the brethren.

A truly soul-searching question for the believer to realise that he has been bought by Christ, through His death, and he no longer live for himself but for a testimony to the people around him. He provides an influence through all that he does. And the fact that he goes to sit in the idol’s temple and eat food sacrificed to idols will not make him a better Christian. How edifying can that be? This is the question that the Apostle Paul is bringing to us.

The command to “take heed” is from the verb “to see”. In other words, “to see to it” or “”to perceive spiritually”. It speaks of the believer continually exercising care to not overstep his spiritual boundary that would cause a weaker believer to stumble in the faith.

Whether one chooses to eat or to abstain from meat does not make him more spiritual or gain any special favour with God. However, when one’s choice of eating or not eating affects the faith of another, it matters in the sight of God. Thank God for showing His people the need to watch their actions when these seemingly personal choices affect the faith of others.

William MacDonald said illustrated well, “For instance, as far as God is concerned, it is not wrong for a believer to eat pork. It would have been wrong for a Jew to do so in the OT, but a Christian is at perfect liberty to partake of such food. However, a Jew converted to Christianity might still have scruples about this. He might feel that it is wrong to eat a roast pork dinner. He is what the Bible calls a weak brother. It means that he is not living in the full enjoyment of his Christian liberty. Actually, as long as he thinks that it is wrong to eat pork, he would sin if he went ahead and did it. That is what is meant by the expression their conscience, being weak, is defiled.”